the review board was always on the posner was right side.plenty did cime out which further casts odudt on oswald did it lie but msm ignored it.just like they will ignore anything that comes out now.
i just turned 51 i can remember in 1993 or bit later one member of board was quoted as thinking a pbs documantary which featured posner which heavily supported the oswald did it cia postion as doing good job.the board was basied towards the official postion even though board helped show things like jfk pulling out of vietnam,cia and others inflirting garrison investigation and Clay Shaw being cia was all true.operation northwoods reveal which shows plan similar to 9/11 is stunning thing and shows what pentagon willing to do.add to this we know how sabtaged the jfk autoposy was.
Thanks for all of your hard work on this topic Mr. DiEugenio! Do you think the likes of Chomsky and Buzzanco will continue to ignore the accumulation of evidence that builds a strong circumstantial case for CIA involvement in the assassination?
Morley is well informed about the JFK Assassination, but actually thought that Oswald killed Tippit, and still believes that Oswald was in Mexico. Neither make any sense.
Fantastic article! Thank you!
Welcome.
the review board was always on the posner was right side.plenty did cime out which further casts odudt on oswald did it lie but msm ignored it.just like they will ignore anything that comes out now.
I would have to reluctantly agree about the five members of the Board itself.
i just turned 51 i can remember in 1993 or bit later one member of board was quoted as thinking a pbs documantary which featured posner which heavily supported the oswald did it cia postion as doing good job.the board was basied towards the official postion even though board helped show things like jfk pulling out of vietnam,cia and others inflirting garrison investigation and Clay Shaw being cia was all true.operation northwoods reveal which shows plan similar to 9/11 is stunning thing and shows what pentagon willing to do.add to this we know how sabtaged the jfk autoposy was.
Thanks for all of your hard work on this topic Mr. DiEugenio! Do you think the likes of Chomsky and Buzzanco will continue to ignore the accumulation of evidence that builds a strong circumstantial case for CIA involvement in the assassination?
Yes I do. Because they do not read them, and would not acknowledge them if they did.
Morley is well informed about the JFK Assassination, but actually thought that Oswald killed Tippit, and still believes that Oswald was in Mexico. Neither make any sense.
We have a disagreement about some things.
Here's #103 Trump's Order and Rep Luna's Probe with Jim DiEugenio: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9IzpX87cef4&t=18s
Thanks Bruce.
James, thank you. This work is thankless and hard but you and other researchers/authors are reshaping our understanding of American history.
You are welcome, and stay tuned.